Injecting some numbers into the AGI debate – Windows On Theory
[Yet another “philosophizing” post, but one with some actual numbers. –Boaz] Recently there have been many debates on “artificial general intelligence” (AGI) and whether or not we…
[Yet another “philosophizing” post, but one with some actual numbers. See also this follow up . –Boaz] Recently there have been many debates on “artificial general intelligence” (AGI) and whether or not we are close to achieving it by scaling up our current AI systems. In this post, I’d like to make this debate a bit more quantitative by trying to understand what “scaling” would entail. The calculations are very rough – think of a post-it that is stuck on the back of an envelope. But I hope that this can be at least a starting point for making these questions more concr
Explore this link on the map →related reading
- AI 2027ai-2027.com
- Why AGI Will Not Happen - Tim Dettmerstimdettmers.com
- My picture of the present in AI — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Three Observations - Sam Altmanblog.samaltman.com
- Artificial General Intelligence Is Already Herenoemamag.com
- I. From GPT-4 to AGI: Counting the OOMs - SITUATIONAL AWARENESSsituational-awareness.ai
- The Scaling Hypothesis · Gwern.netgwern.net
- Clarifying and predicting AGI — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Dario Amodei — "We are near the end of the exponential"dwarkesh.com
- AI in 2025: gestalt — LessWronglesswrong.com
- AI 2027ai-2027.com
- Will scaling work? - by Dwarkesh Patel - Dwarkesh Podcastdwarkesh.com