Tamseel Ahmad
7 followers · 12 following · 3064 views
on the atlas — 182
- A Framework for Putting Mental Models to Practice - Commoncog3 savers
- How to Do What You Love17 savers
- The Lesson to Unlearn6 savers
- Paul Buchheit: Communicating with code5 savers
- Twelve Virtues of Rationality – Eliezer S. Yudkowsky6 savers
- Hanlon's razor1 savers
- Jargon File catb.org/jargon/oldversions/jarg262.txt1 savers
- Algernon's Law 1.12 savers
- Pick A Project, Not A Skill - by Aaron1 savers
- Modular life, meaningful work - by Henrik Karlsson2 savers
- A Dot a Day Keeps the Clutter Away — Scott Lawson1 savers
- The Bitter Lesson78 savers
- bretSite1 savers
- I have no goals, yet everything is accomplished - Deep South Ventures1 savers
- Essays - Deep South Ventures1 savers
- The best general advice on earth « the jsomers.net blog19 savers
- Fix the machine, not the person (Aaron Swartz's Raw Thought)2 savers
- rsrch space4 savers
- Base rate fallacy1 savers
- Usefulness grounds truth - Inverted Passion1 savers
- Nullius in verba2 savers
- On the compulsion to make art - by Henrik Karlsson4 savers
- Defamiliarization3 savers
- Web Design Museum - Discover old websites, apps and software8 savers
- Let’s build a fleet and change the world3 savers
- When To Do What You Love6 savers
- The Religion of Creation1 savers
- What makes a strategy great2 savers
- Quarterly strategic planning using the fairytale structure1 savers
- The Iterative-Hypothesis customer development method2 savers
- Berkson's paradox9 savers
- Lack of Social Grace is a Lack of Skill — LessWrong1 savers
- Most book clubs are doing it wrong « the jsomers.net blog2 savers
- Nat Friedman57 savers
- List of lists - Google Docs4 savers
- There's a place for everyone - by Adam Mastroianni8 savers
- Face it: you're a crazy person - by Adam Mastroianni27 savers
- Everything that turned out well in my life followed the same design process64 savers
- The State of AI2 savers
- trees are harlequins, words are harlequins — the void15 savers
- You Aren't Learning If You Don't Close the Loops - Commoncog3 savers
- indie/personal website | Are.na2 savers
- Jobs2 savers
- Finding My Pathless Path | ssp.sh2 savers
- What It Means To Be An Intellectual (Aaron Swartz's Raw Thought)3 savers
- What Game Theory Reveals About Life, The Universe, and Everything - YouTube3 savers
- Theory of Change (Aaron Swartz's Raw Thought)83 savers
- What Should You Do with Your Life? Directions and Advice - Alexey Guzey73 savers
- A blog post is a very long and complex search query to find fascinating people and make them route interesting stuff to your inbox66 savers
- Speed matters: Why working quickly is more important than it seems « the jsomers.net blog66 savers
- Cultivating a state of mind where new ideas are born65 savers
- MAKING SOFTWARE61 savers
- Here's to the fools who dream54 savers
- sparkly people and how to find them - by Anson Yu53 savers
- Reality has a surprising amount of detail49 savers
- What's going on here, with this human? - Graham Duncan Blog49 savers
- 95%-ile isn't that good44 savers
- Life Is Not Short44 savers
- advice - nabeelqu43 savers
- Learning By Writing42 savers
- Cities and Ambition42 savers
- Think more about what to focus on - by Henrik Karlsson41 savers
- Make Something Wonderful | Steve Jobs39 savers
- This is Water by David Foster Wallace (Full Transcript and Audio) - Farnam Street35 savers
- College as an incubator of Girardian terror | Dan Wang35 savers
- Good conversations have lots of doorknobs34 savers
- HOWTO: Be more productive (Aaron Swartz's Raw Thought)34 savers
- Home Page33 savers
- Learn In Public30 savers
- How to think in writing - by Henrik Karlsson29 savers
- The Best Textbooks on Every Subject - LessWrong28 savers
- More people should write « the jsomers.net blog28 savers
- An app can be a home-cooked meal26 savers
- Are you serious? - by visakan veerasamy25 savers
- So you wanna de-bog yourself - by Adam Mastroianni24 savers
- First we shape our social graph; then it shapes us22 savers
- Networked Thought22 savers
- Are.na22 savers
- James Mulholland21 savers
- Pick an audience that is into the illegible you of today, not your past achievements21 savers
- Don’t sacrifice the wrong thing - by Henrik Karlsson21 savers
- James Somers19 savers
- neal.fun19 savers
- Nadia Asparouhova | The independent researcher19 savers
- Alexey Guzey18 savers
- How To Become A Hacker17 savers
- Make Something Heavy - by Anu - Working Theorys17 savers
- The Recurse Center17 savers
- On agency - by Henrik Karlsson - Escaping Flatland17 savers
- Everything Good in NYC - Google Docs16 savers
- Are you serious? - by visakan veerasamy16 savers
- Beliefs16 savers
- The Marginalian – Marginalia on our search for meaning.16 savers
- School is Not Enough - by Simon Sarris15 savers
- A Big Little Idea Called Legibility15 savers
- Lessons from Peter Thiel | Posts | 8VC15 savers
- Scraping training data for your mind - by Henrik Karlsson14 savers
- IMG_000114 savers
- Reflections on Palantir - Nabeel S. Qureshi13 savers
- Do Things that Don't Scale13 savers
highlights — 1025
Another test you can use is: always produce. For example, if you have a day job you don't take seriously because you plan to be a novelist, are you producing? Are you writing pages of fiction, however bad? As long as you're producing, you'll know you're not merely using the hazy vision of the grand novel you plan to write one day as an opiate. The view of it will be obstructed by the all too palpably flawed one you're actually writing.
How to Do What You LoveOf course none of the code from my prototype ever made it near the real product (thankfully), but that code did something that fancy arguments couldn't do (at least not my fancy arguments), it showed that the idea and product had real potential. The point of this story, I think, is that you should consider spending less time talking, and more time prototyping, especially if you're not very good at talking or powerpoint. Your code can be a very persuasive argument. The other point is that it's important to make prototyping new ideas, especially bad ideas, as fast and easy as possible. This can …
Paul Buchheit: Communicating with codeNever attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity.
Hanlon's razorWhen I was younger the narrator used to convince me and I’d get carried away and try to solve my problems; I would have a miserable time. But one of the perks of getting older is that I have enough emotional experience now, so I trust that if I just take care of my bodily needs, the feelings and thoughts will sort themselves out—even if I don’t find that intellectually plausible in the moment. I will let the voice spin its stories for a few days while I sleep and eat and lay down with the 3-year-old on my belly. Slowly the narrator will become sane again.
Modular life, meaningful work - by Henrik KarlssonThat's the entire system. Sticker sheets cost a few dollars, and there is no database, no server, and no app. The system that works is the one simple enough to do every day for four years.
A Dot a Day Keeps the Clutter Away — Scott LawsonEvery box already had a label on the front with its category and the date I created the box. The new rule was simple: every time I open a box, I place one colored dot sticker near the label. That's it. Use the box, add a dot.
A Dot a Day Keeps the Clutter Away — Scott LawsonIf I kept acquiring parts at this pace without getting rid of anything, I would eventually drown. I needed a way to figure out what was worth keeping and what should go, so the system can reach a steady state.
A Dot a Day Keeps the Clutter Away — Scott LawsonThe two methods that seem to scale arbitrarily in this way are search and learning.
The Bitter Lessonthe actual contents of minds are tremendously, irredeemably complex; we should stop trying to find simple ways to think about the contents of minds, such as simple ways to think about space, objects, multiple agents, or symmetries. All these are part of the arbitrary, intrinsically-complex, outside world. They are not what should be built in, as their complexity is endless; instead we should build in only the meta-methods that can find and capture this arbitrary complexity. Essential to these methods is that they can find good approximations, but the search for them should be by our methods, n…
The Bitter LessonWe have to learn the bitter lesson that building in how we think we think does not work in the long run.
The Bitter LessonReality is simply a collection of everything that impacts us (or could potentially impact us). And the only way for us to define it is via our tools and models. Models of reality (that work) is reality. Newton’s laws didn’t stop working (or, equivalently, being useful) once Einstein proposed relativity. Einstein simply expanded our repertoire of tools we have to intervene in reality.
Usefulness grounds truth - Inverted PassionSo, truths are, ultimately, bets about what could turn out to be useful.
Usefulness grounds truth - Inverted Passion“The more you work, the more things come to you. It’s a very amusing function,” the sculptor writes. “You get into a good circle, where the more you make, the more you can do, and the more ideas come to you. And conversely, if you’re away from it, it’s very hard to get going again. And your stomach starts to hurt, and you get depressed. Then you just have to throw yourself into it, but that can be hard.
On the compulsion to make art - by Henrik KarlssonI found much more comfort in the stories of artists who fixed toilets but never got famous, and who did it anyway. It helped me remember that that cave man desire to populate the earth with your art is normal.
On the compulsion to make art - by Henrik KarlssonThe process of strategy creation must indeed tackle the complexity of the world, but the output of that process is a document that frees everyone else from having to re-solve every puzzle.
What makes a strategy greatSimplicity that ignores reality is reductive, but simplicity that arises from an exceptional summarization of having already processed the messy, complex world, is elegant.
What makes a strategy greatThe guiding question is: Which are the few issues where, if we solved them or took a huge bite out of them, but allowed all others to fester without any progress whatsoever, we would have substantially improved our velocity, or competitiveness, or team dynamic, or retention rate, or something similarly critical.
Quarterly strategic planning using the fairytale structureThis is where the customer stops talking about her own life, her own problems, what features or price tag would be acceptable to her, and starts talking on behalf of other people.
The Iterative-Hypothesis customer development methodUse your customers’ words, not your own. Discover those words, by recording the meetings and noting exactly what they say.
The Iterative-Hypothesis customer development methodone technique is to ask them to describe, in painstaking detail, exactly how they will use the product in their daily life. When would they open it up, how does it fit into their workflow, which features do they invoke, how do they move the outputs into other systems? This works because while they really do mean “yes, I think that sounds good,” thinking it through uncovers barriers that in fact blocks the sale; it turns out they need it to integrate better with something, or they actually need a feature you weren’t contemplating, or some other hiccup.
The Iterative-Hypothesis customer development methodReal patterns will stand out from that noise; that’s your fundamental truth, that you can build products and strategies around. There might not be much of it. All the more reason to highlight it.
The Iterative-Hypothesis customer development methodWhen someone actually visits your pricing page in future, this is also the experience they will have—reacting to a specific price. It’s smart to test what that experience will be like.
The Iterative-Hypothesis customer development methodOne group was shocked—shocked—that the price tag would be so high; they would never pay even close to that amount. Another group said they would only buy the service if it were much more expensive, because otherwise they know it couldn’t possibly fulfill its promises. (Those groups turned out to be emergent segments; see above.)
The Iterative-Hypothesis customer development methodBut in my opinion the price-tag is an essential component of the interview, because I believe the price is inextricably linked to what the product means to that person, therefore how they think about it and how it affects their life.
The Iterative-Hypothesis customer development methodIt’s also possible there’s nothing to learn because you’re fishing in the wrong spot
The Iterative-Hypothesis customer development methodWhen the surprises stop, that means learning has stopped, and that means you should stop the process.
The Iterative-Hypothesis customer development methodIf you hear anything surprising, ask follow-up questions. Surprise means you’re learning
The Iterative-Hypothesis customer development methodIt’s important to list even the most obvious, mundane assumptions, because you’ll be surprised how often you’re wrong or they need adjustment, even if you’re an expert in the field.
The Iterative-Hypothesis customer development methodThe second reason to write down hypotheses is that, as we’re about to see, they will help us generate great interview questions.
The Iterative-Hypothesis customer development methodPeople are more objective at seeking the truth when they’re forced to record their predictions—for example as formal “bets”—and observe how reality confirms or clashes with those bets.
The Iterative-Hypothesis customer development methodLong before whole brain emulation, most of us already spend our days making countless glass-quiet commutes between us-west-2 and us-east-1.
Zugunruhe - Aidan Smithyou learn the big ideas from the bottom up: you start by working hard on concrete examples, which are then generalized (often with help from others) into useful principles, honed by more work, and generalized again. The cycle is repeated and before you know it you will really know it.
Those maps at the beginning of books, or, a few words about teaching « the jsomers.net blogThe key for me, again, is to scaffold only after I've got some meat, but still early enough to enable ample use of that scaffold.
Those maps at the beginning of books, or, a few words about teaching « the jsomers.net blogGood books are almost fractally deep: you find whole worlds wherever you look, and no matter how far in you zoom
Most book clubs are doing it wrong « the jsomers.net blogI spoke earlier about planting acorns so that oaks will grow. You can’t always know exactly where to be, but you can keep active in places where something might happen.
You And Your Research · Gwern.netIf what you are doing is not important, and if you don’t think it is going to lead to something important, why are you at Bell Labs working on it?
You And Your Research · Gwern.netDarwin writes in his autobiography that he found it necessary to write down every piece of evidence which appeared to contradict his beliefs because otherwise they would disappear from his mind
You And Your Research · Gwern.netWhat most people think are the best working conditions, are not. Very clearly they are not because people are often most productive when working conditions are bad.
You And Your Research · Gwern.netOr rather, and this is the point: there was a gap. The gap has shrunk.
Pseudonyms lets you practice agency - by Henrik KarlssonThe Gell-Mann Effect, also called the Gell-Mann Amnesia Effect describes the phenomenon of an expert believing news articles on topics outside of their field of expertise even after acknowledging that articles written in the same publication that are within the expert's field of expertise are error-ridden and full of misunderstanding.
Gell-Mann Amnesia Effect | Loricism Wiki | FandomThis, Glass thinks, lies at the heart of what art does: it takes everyday human perception and refines it through rigorous practice. Drawing forces you to look at the world—but it is the capacity to look that it is really about.
The newness of depth - by Henrik KarlssonMy job is to figure out how she models the world in her head, not to teach her.
Socratic dialogue with kids - by Henrik Karlssonthe way she thinks will change and converge on a better model as she struggles to be more exact
Socratic dialogue with kids - by Henrik KarlssonI’m simply trying to understand how she thinks.
Socratic dialogue with kids - by Henrik KarlssonBut books that force us to talk about what we read to make sure that it makes sense to Maud—these books pull out our hidden thoughts so Maud can see them. And then she imitates us.
Reading challenging books with kids is fun and probably usefulNot only do we need to not die of boredom. We also need to remember to fake that we are asking questions since the text is really too flat for any questions to arise.
Reading challenging books with kids is fun and probably usefulReading serious literature with kids makes the strategies that Collins et al suggested intuitive and obvious. You don’t have to plan exercises and be clever the way a teacher has to be (and most fail to). You can just be yourself.
Reading challenging books with kids is fun and probably usefulthere is nothing more painful to humans than our freedom, that we are responsible for everything we do, and so we long to submit to an authority
A list of books and essays that I love - by Henrik KarlssonAll of the moments that no one else will ever remember
The moments - by Henrik Karlsson - Escaping FlatlandIn a normal play, you know where everything is going, so you can relax into the story; but here, you had to be on the edge of your seat, because you never knew which line of dialogue held the key to it all. Each night, Glass experienced the emotional climax in a new part of the play.
The moments - by Henrik Karlsson - Escaping Flatland