95%-ile isn't that good
Reaching 95%-ile isn't very impressive because it's not that hard to do. I think this is one of my most ridiculable ideas. It doesn't help that, when stated nakedly, that sounds elitist. But I think it's just the opposite: most people can become (relatively) good at most things.
95%-ile isn't that good Reaching 95%-ile isn't very impressive because it's not that hard to do. I think this is one of my most ridiculable ideas. It doesn't help that, when stated nakedly, that sounds elitist. But I think it's just the opposite: most people can become (relatively) good at most things. Note that when I say 95%-ile, I mean 95%-ile among people who participate, not all people (for many activities, just doing it at all makes you 99%-ile or above across all people). I'm also not referring to 95%-ile among people who practice regularly. The " one weird trick " is that, for a lot of
saved by
- Yufei Xiao
- Jacky Zhao
- Anson Yu
- Trang Đoàn
- James Rogers
- Pranav
- Pier-Luc Nadeau-Labadie
- Kaylee George
- Ruozhen Gong
- Colleen Chang
- brunella k
- HudZah
related reading
- 95%-ile isn't that gooddanluucination.github.io
- Searching for outliers | benkuhn.netbenkuhn.net
- Don't Surround Yourself With Smarter People — Ribbonfarmribbonfarm.com
- Being the (Pareto) Best in the World — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Half-assing it with everything you've gotmindingourway.com
- Humans are not automatically strategic — LessWronglesswrong.com
- How to Be Great? Just Be Good, Repeatablyblog.stephsmith.io
- How to instantly be better at thingsusefulfictions.substack.com
- Post 35: Your Standards are Too High - Neel Nandaneelnanda.io
- Some thoughts on writingdanluu.com
- Some reasons to work on productivity and velocitydanluu.com
- Is this a career? - by Benn Stancil - benn.substackbenn.substack.com