Never trust The Science™ - by Adam Rochussen
substack.com · 2,348 words · saved by 1 readers
On the need to identify bias and interpret data yourself
Science starts with a question. “Which diet is best for preventing cancer?” “Is climate change killing babies?” “How did neanderthal DNA get into Eurasian human DNA?” But before scientists get to answer their question, they need funding. The first bias to make an appearance is funding bias. You see, certain kinds of questions aren’t really allowed to be asked. They’re just not kosher. Favouring certain types of inquiry over others is a fundamentally political choice, not a scientific one, with the downside being that some interesting areas of research are neglected, while other areas get…
related reading
- No, it’s not The Incentives—it’s you – [citation needed]talyarkoni.org
- How Should We Critique Research? · Gwern.netgwern.net
- The trouble in comparing different approaches to science fundingscienceplusplus.org
- How much do you believe your results? — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Knowing About Biases Can Hurt People — LessWronglesswrong.com
- The Control Group Is Out Of Controlslatestarcodex.com
- Biases: An Introductionreadthesequences.com
- The rise and fall of peer review - by Adam Mastroianniexperimentalhistory.substack.com
- Your intuitions are not magic — LessWronglesswrong.com
- The Folly of Scientismthenewatlantis.com
- An irrational constraint is the motivating force in modern scienceaeon.co
- Against NHST — LessWronglesswrong.com