No, it’s not The Incentives—it’s you – [citation needed]
There’s a narrative I find kind of troubling, but that unfortunately seems to be growing more common in science. The core idea is that the mere existence of perverse incentives is a valid and…
There’s a narrative I find kind of troubling, but that unfortunately seems to be growing more common in science. The core idea is that the mere existence of perverse incentives is a valid and sufficient reason to knowingly behave in an antisocial way, just as long as one first acknowledges the existence of those perverse incentives. The way this dynamic usually unfolds is that someone points out some fairly serious problem with the way many scientists behave—say, our collective propensity to p-hack as if it’s going out of style , or the fact that we insist on submitting our manuscr
saved by
related reading
- Incentives are for losersexperimental-history.com
- Incentives are for losersexperimental-history.com
- Incentives are for loserssubstack.com
- Market Failures in Sciencemilan.cvitkovic.net
- An invitation to a secret society - by Adam Mastroianniexperimental-history.com
- How Life Sciences Actually Work: Findings of a Year-Long Investigation - Alexey Guzeyguzey.com
- mimeticbriantimar.com
- The machines are fine. I'm worried about us.ergosphere.blog
- The one science reform we can all agree on, but we're too cowardly to doexperimental-history.com
- To academia or not to academiawilliamjbowman.com
- Startling differences between humans and jukeboxesexperimental-history.com
- Reading Incentives Without Losing Your Soulsaranormous.substack.com