The rise and fall of peer review - by Adam Mastroianni

Why the greatest scientific experiment in history failed, and why that's a great thing

The rise and fall of peer review Why the greatest scientific experiment in history failed, and why that's a great thing Adam Mastroianni Dec 13, 2022 1,283 378 97 Share Article voiceover 0:00 -21:13 Audio playback is not supported on your browser. Please upgrade. Photo cred: my dad For the last 60 years or so, science has been running an experiment on itself. The experimental design wasn’t great; there was no randomization and no control group. Nobody was in charge, exactly, and nobody was really taking consistent measurements. And yet it was the most massive experiment ever run, and it includ

saved by

• Benjamin Laufer
• Bonnie Chin
• yash ramchandani
• Eli Qian

related reading

• The rise and fall of peer reviewexperimental-history.com
• Real peer review has never been tried - Works in Progress Magazineworksinprogress.co
• An invitation to a secret society - by Adam Mastroianniexperimental-history.com
• The one science reform we can all agree on, but we're too cowardly to doexperimental-history.com
• How Life Sciences Actually Work: Findings of a Year-Long Investigation - Alexey Guzeyguzey.com
• Is Science Stagnant? - The Atlantictheatlantic.com
• A Vision of Metasciencescienceplusplus.org
• Real peer review has never been tried - Works in Progress Magazineworksinprogress.co
• Three myths about scientific peer review – Michael Nielsenmichaelnielsen.org
• A Vision of Metasciencescienceplusplus.org
• Let’s build a fleet and change the worldexperimental-history.com
• Text is king - by Adam Mastroianni - Experimental Historyexperimental-history.com