The trouble in comparing different approaches to science funding
Working notes on how to compare different approaches to science funding. Focuses on clarifying several challenges that must be addressed for such comparisons to be meaningful. We'd love to hear thoughtful comments and corrections, including pointers to related work. (Please leave comments at the bottom).
The trouble in comparing different approaches to science funding Michael Nielsen and Kanjun Qiu February 9, 2022 Working notes on how to compare different approaches to science funding. Focuses on clarifying several challenges that must be addressed for such comparisons to be meaningful. We'd love to hear thoughtful comments and corrections, including pointers to related work. (Please leave comments at the bottom ). There's a striking vision, now gaining momentum, where we "turn the scientific method on ourselves" 1 , in part to help improve our scientific institutions. This vision is exciting
saved by
related reading
- A Vision of Metasciencescienceplusplus.org
- A Vision of Metasciencescienceplusplus.org
- Is Science Stagnant? - The Atlantictheatlantic.com
- How Life Sciences Actually Work: Findings of a Year-Long Investigation - Alexey Guzeyguzey.com
- Developing the science of science - Works in Progress Magazineworksinprogress.co
- Work on these things - Marginal REVOLUTIONmarginalrevolution.com
- Quick thoughts on researchmichaelnotebook.com
- Nintil - Limits and Possibilities of Metasciencenintil.com
- The Six Camps of Metasciencemacroscience.org
- How Life Sciences Actually Work: Findings of a Year-Long Investigation - Alexey Guzeycurius.app
- Market Failures in Sciencemilan.cvitkovic.net
- Papers, Policies, and Prototypes - science betterscibetter.com