Comments_on_Williamson_Good_as_Usual_APA_2.17.26.docx

N/A

# link_1z4dqoqle3s.pdf ## Metadata - PDFFormatVersion=1.4 - Language=en - IsLinearized=false - IsAcroFormPresent=false - IsXFAPresent=false - IsCollectionPresent=false - IsSignaturesPresent=false - Title=Comments_on_Williamson_Good_as_Usual_APA_2.17.26.docx - Producer=Skia/PDF m146 Google Docs Renderer ## Contents ### Page 1 Comments on Williamson’s Good as Usual APA Eastern Division, 2026 Justin Clarke-Doane Columbia University Punch line: Even if Williamson is right that normative discourse often expresses mind-independent truths, many of which we know (Good as Usual, 2025, p. 4)

saved by

• Tajei Puthucheary

related reading

• Why should ethical anti-realists do ethics? - Joe Carlsmithjoecarlsmith.com
• What Do We Mean By "Rationality"? — LessWronglesswrong.com
• Is–ought problem - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
• Automating philosophy if Timothy Williamson is correct — LessWronglesswrong.com
• After Orthogonality: Virtue-Ethical Agency and AI Alignmentthegradient.pub
• Base Camp for Mt. Ethicsnickbostrom.com
• In defence of epistemic modesty — EA Forumforum.effectivealtruism.org
• Naïve Instrumentalism vs Principled Proceduralismgoodthoughts.blog
• Dialogue: Is there a Natural Abstraction of Good? — LessWronglesswrong.com
• Moral Disagreementplato.stanford.edu
• A Case Against Strong Longtermism | Vaden Masranivmasrani.github.io
• Annoyingly Principled People, and what befalls them — LessWronglesswrong.com