Why should ethical anti-realists do ethics? - Joe Carlsmith
joecarlsmith.com · 9,667 words · saved by 3 readers
Who needs a system if you're free?
Why should ethical anti-realists do ethics? - Joe Carlsmith Why should ethical anti-realists do ethics? Contents hide 1. Introduction 2. The problem 2.1 Map-making with no territory 2.2 Why curve-fit? 2.3 Who needs ethics if you’re free? 3. Some examples where this stuff comes up 3.1 Drowning children stuff 3.2 Lizard stuff 3.3 Scott Alexander on rejecting the “philosophy game” 4. I’m not trying to turn you into a lizard 5. Some kind of brute preference for consistency and systematization? 6. Money-pumps 6.1 Dialogue with an intransitive agent 6.2 Coherence isn’t free 6.3 Can we even think out
saved by
related reading
- Seeing more whole - Joe Carlsmithjoecarlsmith.com
- On sincerity - Joe Carlsmithjoecarlsmith.com
- Fake thinking and real thinking - Joe Carlsmithjoecarlsmith.com
- mda75bad67d00ec1a6695f5352425966eora.ox.ac.uk
- "Moral progress" vs. the simple passage of timecold-takes.com
- Alienation and meta-ethics (or: is it possible you should maximize helium?) - Joe Carlsmithjoecarlsmith.com
- Base Camp for Mt. Ethicsnickbostrom.com
- How To Be Good | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
- Loosening the grip of utilitarianismacotra.substack.com
- Future-proof ethicscold-takes.com
- Consequentialism FAQweb.archive.org
- Derek Parfit - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org