Tajei Puthucheary
3 followers · 3 following · 245 views
on the atlas — 4
- Lifelong learning and the Aims of Higher Education1 savers
- Fine Counterfactuals1 savers
- Trotsky and the Wild Orchids1 savers
- Comments_on_Williamson_Good_as_Usual_APA_2.17.26.docx1 savers
highlights — 3
It fails to vindicate normative knowledge’ s deliberative sufficiency . We can know the normative facts while still wondering what to do—and not just in the sense that we threaten to be weak in will or confused. We can wonder whether to regulate our behavior by consulting the properties we actually pick out with normative language.
Comments_on_Williamson_Good_as_Usual_APA_2.17.26.docxWilliamson’ s realism, while checking all the boxes, is practically insufficient. This is not a failure of his view per se. It is a limitation of any realist – or even cognitivist – theory.
Comments_on_Williamson_Good_as_Usual_APA_2.17.26.docxIf non-normative, then it is irrelevant to what to do (Eklund 2017: “tasty” example). If normative, then we iterate. Normative properties are natural, normativeᵀʷ ⁱ ⁿ properties are naturalᵀʷ ⁱ ⁿ. Now: whether to consult natural or naturalᵀʷ ⁱ ⁿ properties?
Comments_on_Williamson_Good_as_Usual_APA_2.17.26.docx