Naïve Instrumentalism vs Principled Proceduralism
goodthoughts.blog · 1,233 words · saved by 2 readers
Not your standard consequentialism-deontology distinction
Naïve Instrumentalists are practically unconstrained in pursuit of their moral or political goals. If it seems to them, just based on the immediately legible evidence, that violence or deception would advance their goals, they won’t hesitate to act accordingly. Principled Proceduralists, by contrast, allow their instrumental pursuits to be practically constrained by rules, principles, or procedures that promote co-operation and limit downside risk (incl. of escalating conflict) in a way that can be appreciated somewhat independently of their particular beliefs or commitments. Now, if all…
saved by
related reading
- Deontology and virtue ethics as "effective theories" of consequentialist ethics — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Why should ethical anti-realists do ethics? - Joe Carlsmithjoecarlsmith.com
- What Do We Mean By "Rationality"? — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Why Not Utilitarianism?bleedingheartlibertarians.com
- Pragmatism - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Instrumental and value rationality - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Alignment & Succession: Morality Lives in the Human Individualnosetgauge.com
- Rule Consequentialism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)plato.stanford.edu
- Loosening the grip of utilitarianismacotra.substack.com
- After Orthogonality: Virtue-Ethical Agency and AI Alignmentthegradient.pub
- Why I Don't Buy Any of the Counterexamples to Consequentialismbenthams.substack.com
- On the limits of idealized values - Joe Carlsmithjoecarlsmith.com