Automating philosophy if Timothy Williamson is correct — LessWrong
Edit: This post duplicated a shortform I wrote 6 months ago, which I'd forgotten about when going through my drafts yesterday. Apologies! This post s…
x Automating philosophy if Timothy Williamson is correct — LessWrong Meta-Philosophy AI World Modeling Frontpage 54 Automating philosophy if Timothy Williamson is correct by Cleo Nardo 20th Apr 2026 3 min read 19 54 Edit: This post duplicated a shortform I wrote 6 months ago, which I'd forgotten about when going through my drafts yesterday. Apologies! This post supercedes the shortform, but interested readers should check its replies. Timothy Williamson thinks philosophy is unexceptional. Timothy Williamson [1] thinks that philosophy [2] is far less distinct as a science as many people believe
saved by
related reading
- Why I'm not a philosophergleech.org
- On the Utility of Philosophylogangraves.com
- How to Do Philosophypaulgraham.com
- What Philosophy Is Good Forjessylin.com
- Philosophy of Mathematics (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)plato.stanford.edu
- How to Do Philosophypaulgraham.com
- Philosophy: A Diseased Discipline — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Less Wrong Rationality and Mainstream Philosophy — LessWronglesswrong.com
- The Argument from Philosophical Difficulty — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Philosophy: A Diseased Discipline — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Less Wrong Rationality and Mainstream Philosophy — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Possibility and Could-ness — LessWronglesswrong.com