AI Timelines: Where the Arguments, and the "Experts," Stand
cold-takes.com · 3,251 words · saved by 1 readers
What the best available forecasting methods say - and why there's no "expert field" for this topic.
Audio also available by searching Stitcher, Spotify, Google Podcasts, etc. for "Cold Takes Audio" --> This piece starts with a summary of when we should expect transformative AI to be developed, based on the multiple angles covered previously in the series. I think this is useful, even if you've read all of the previous pieces, but if you'd like to skip it, click here . I then address the question: "Why isn't there a robust expert consensus on this topic, and what does that mean for us?" I estimate that there is more than a 10% chance we'll see transformative AI within 15 years (by 2036); a ~5
related reading
- AI Timelines — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Broad Timelines - Toby Ordtobyord.com
- The Most Important Century: Sequence Introduction — LessWronglesswrong.com
- The "most important century" blog post seriescold-takes.com
- The Most Important Century: The Animation — EA Forumforum.effectivealtruism.org
- Why should I have opinions about AI timelines?substack.com
- Forecasting transformative AI: the "biological anchors" method in a nutshellcold-takes.com
- Why do people disagree about when powerful AI will arrive?blog.bluedot.org
- The AI Superforecasters Are Here - by Scott Alexanderastralcodexten.com
- "Long" timelines to advanced AI have gotten crazy shorthelentoner.substack.com
- [2104.12871] Why AI is Harder Than We Thinkarxiv.org
- Consider chilling out in 2028 — LessWronglesswrong.com