Why Not Utilitarianism? - Bleeding Heart Libertarians
A lot of very smart non-philosophers are attracted to some form of utilitarianism. Some of these people, like Ilya Somin and Mike Rappaport are generally sympathetic to the idea of...
A lot of very smart non-philosophers are attracted to some form of utilitarianism. Some of these people, like Ilya Somin and Mike Rappaport are generally sympathetic to the idea of bleeding heart libertarianism, but think that utilitarianism does a better job explaining and defending its attractive qualities than do appeals to “social justice.” Actually, even though he sounds less sympathetic, I think this is basically David Friedman’s position too (even though he ultimately rejects utilitarianism as a fully adequate moral theory). In contrast to these fellow travelers, most philosophers do…
saved by
related reading
- Consequentialism FAQweb.archive.org
- The Trouble With "Good" — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Rule Consequentialism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)plato.stanford.edu
- Arguments for Utilitarianism | Utilitarianism.netutilitarianism.net
- Why I am not an effective altruist - by Erik Hoeltheintrinsicperspective.com
- Elements and Types of Utilitarianism | Utilitarianism.netutilitarianism.net
- Utilitarianism, Act and Rule | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophyiep.utm.edu
- Point-by-point critique of Ord’s “Why I’m Not a Negative Utilitarian”centerforreducingsuffering.org
- How To Be Good | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
- Deontology and virtue ethics as "effective theories" of consequentialist ethics — LessWronglesswrong.com
- The History of Utilitarianism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)plato.stanford.edu
- mda75bad67d00ec1a6695f5352425966eora.ox.ac.uk