Diet should be a tool for researchers, not a treatment
nature.com · 159 words · saved by 1 readers
Peter J. Turnbaugh explains why scientists can’t tell you what to eat to prevent disease.
Email Bluesky Facebook LinkedIn Reddit Whatsapp X You have full access to this article via your institution. Download PDF A recent report 1 about the health consequences of eating red and processed meat renewed long-standing debates about what evidence should be required before the public are told what foods they should avoid. For me, this subject hits especially close to home — my lab’s research shows that meat consumption alters the human and mouse gut microbiomes, and I am frequently asked if meat is “bad for gut microbes”. Our results indicate that meat consumption promotes the growth of b
related reading
- Eat Real Foodrealfood.gov
- So you have to take antibiotics. How do you repair your microbiome?stephenskolnick.substack.com
- Gut micro-organisms associated with health, nutrition and dietary interventionsnature.com
- In Defense of Food: My Review | Say what, Michael Pollan?saywhatmichaelpollan.wordpress.com
- Where’s the Beef?harpers.org
- A dietitian's guide to 'clean eating': what it is and how to do it right | Food | The Guardiantheguardian.com
- Lab-grown meat has a P.R. problem | Food and Environment Reporting Networkthefern.org
- Never trust The Science™substack.com
- Problematic Proteinsmaggieappleton.com
- Outside the Laboratory — LessWronglesswrong.com
- What if You Have it Backwards?blog.nateliason.com
- Insulin Resistance and Glycemic Index — LessWronglesswrong.com