Bending the barbell of value accrual
x.com · 1,120 words · saved by 1 readers
https://t.co/pKbztmfQ0X
During the early and middle stages of a platform shift, there's money to be made at every layer of the stack. Generally though, as the cycle matures, value distribution reveals itself to be barbelled towards the bottom (e.g., semis) and the top (e.g., applications). This is well understood but mostly easily exemplified by the PC era, during which the lion’s share of economic surplus went to the applications that ran on top of Windows (e.g., Office, Adobe, enterprise software) rather than to the OS itself. Microsoft’s durability came from its developer flywheel, which then kept the middle…
related reading
- Training Imperativesdan.io
- Things I Don't Know About AI - by Elad Gil - Elad Blogblog.eladgil.com
- Who Owns the Generative AI Platform? | Andreessen Horowitza16z.com
- Who Owns the Generative AI Platform? | Andreessen Horowitza16z.com
- The Economics of Generative AI: Two Years Laterapoorv03.com
- Aakash Thumaty (@letsleverup) on Xx.com
- Random thoughts while gazing at the misty AI Frontierblog.eladgil.com
- The Ai Decoupling | Vintage Datavintagedata.org
- Yiping Wang (@ypwang61) on Xx.com
- Hyperscalers vs AI Labs Debate, and the Moving AI Frontiermbi-deepdives.com
- Nick Grossman (@nickgrossman) on Xx.com
- AI Platforms, Markets, & Open Source - by Elad Gilblog.eladgil.com