The Economics of Generative AI: Two Years Later
apoorv03.com · 1,422 words · saved by 1 readers
Semi is a one-player game. Apps is a two-player game. Infra is the only competitive layer.
I am excited to update my original analysis from 2024: The Economics of Generative AI. This is the analysis I come back to more than anything else I’ve written because it’s a reminder of the “physics” of the AI industry. Two years ago, I found that the Gen AI value chain was inverted: the compute layer captured ~83% of all revenue and ~87% of all gross profit. The application layer, despite being closest to end customers, earned almost nothing. I predicted this would flip over time, following the pattern of every prior platform shift. Two years ago, I said: Two years since, the AI…
saved by
related reading
- Who Owns the Generative AI Platform? | Andreessen Horowitza16z.com
- Generative AI’s Act Two | Sequoia Capitalsequoiacap.com
- Generative AI's Act o1: The Reasoning Era Begins | Sequoia Capitalsequoiacap.com
- Who Owns the Generative AI Platform? | Andreessen Horowitza16z.com
- The Short Case for Nvidia Stock | YouTube Transcript Optimizeryoutubetranscriptoptimizer.com
- Navigating the High Cost of AI Compute | Andreessen Horowitza16z.com
- Clouded Judgement 7.3.26 - The End of Compute Scarcity? Not So Fastcloudedjudgement.substack.com
- Nvidia Envy: understanding the GPU gold rushblog.johnluttig.com
- Alchemy is all you needpress.airstreet.com
- The AI Chip Supply Chain — A Primerjoshuamuthu.substack.com
- The Ai Decoupling | Vintage Datavintagedata.org
- Navigating the High Cost of AI Compute | Andreessen Horowitza16z.com