China Is Taking AI Safety Seriously. So Must the U.S. | TIME
time.com · 985 words · saved by 1 readers
"Chinese leaders may have a lesson for the West’s AI boosters: true speed requires control," writes Brian Tse.
“China doesn’t care about AI safety—so why should we?” This flawed logic pervades U.S. policy and tech circles, offering cover for a reckless race to the bottom as Washington rushes to outpace Beijing in AI development. According to this rationale, regulating AI would risk falling behind in the so-called “ AI arms race .” And since China supposedly doesn’t prioritize safety, racing ahead—even recklessly—is the safer long-term bet. This narrative is not just wrong ; it’s dangerous. Ironically, Chinese leaders may have a lesson for the U.S.’s AI boosters: true speed requires control. As China’s
related reading
- Xi-Trump to talk AI Safety, Huh?chinatalk.media
- A Path Forward on AI Safety for the United States and Chinacarnegieendowment.org
- Is China Serious About AI Safety? | AI Frontiersai-frontiers.org
- AI Coordination Without Illusionaei.org
- 2028: Two scenarios for global AI leadership \ Anthropicanthropic.com
- AI Safety in China: A Primerjasminexli.substack.com
- Chinese Audiences Are Reading Western AI Safety Discourse | AI Frontiersai-frontiers.org
- Laying the groundwork for US-China AI dialogue | Brookingsbrookings.edu
- Kernel | “Democracy-Affirming” AI Could Make Things Even Worsekernelmag.io
- China Says It Cares About Loss of Controlocpl.substack.com
- Does China care about AGI?highcapacity.org
- The AI Arms Race Isn’t Inevitablepalladiummag.com