2028: Two scenarios for global AI leadership \ Anthropic
anthropic.com · 5,538 words · saved by 12 readers
Our views on the AI competition between the US and China.
Policy 2028: Two scenarios for global AI leadership May 14, 2026 We’re releasing a new paper that explains our views on the competition on AI between the US and China. It’s essential that the US and its allies stay ahead of authoritarian governments like the Chinese Communist Party, or CCP. AI will soon become powerful enough to be used to repress citizens at unprecedented scale, and even to alter the balance of power among nations . And since AI is advancing more quickly by the day, we have only a limited period of time to set the conditions of the competition—and determine whether and how th
saved by
- Falah Rajput
- Elizabeth Qiu
- Brandon Wang
- Ratan Kaliani
- Aaron Pham
- Joshua Muthu
- khalid kaime
- Jason Hausenloy
- Will Anderson
- Tanvi Reddy
- Dillon Nguyen
- Seth Lifland
related reading
- Dario Amodei — On DeepSeek and Export Controlsdarioamodei.com
- AI 2040: Plan Aai-2040.com
- America’s AI Action Planwhitehouse.gov
- Our position on open-weights models \ Anthropicanthropic.com
- Off Target | CNAScnas.org
- China's AI Models Are Closing the Gap—but America's Real Advantage Lies Elsewhere | RANDrand.org
- AI 2040: Plan Aai-2040.com
- How to pace the US frontierblog.aifutures.org
- Seeking Stability in the Competition for AI Advantage | RANDrand.org
- How Should the US Prepare for Increasingly Automated AI R&D? | IFPifp.org
- Why America Wins - by Scott Alexander and Romeo Deanblog.ai-futures.org
- Dario Amodei — On DeepSeek and Export Controlsdarioamodei.com