Technological stagnation: Why I came around
rootsofprogress.org · 2,458 words · saved by 1 readers
I was skeptical at first, but have come to believe the stagnation hypothesis. Here's why
Technological stagnation: Why I came around The Roots of Progress About the blog • Writing • Speaking • Bibliography • Subscribe • Roots of Progress Institute Technological stagnation Why I came around by Jason Crawford · January 23, 2021 · 9 min read “We wanted flying cars , instead we got 140 characters,” says Peter Thiel’s Founders Fund , expressing a sort of jaded disappointment with technological progress. (The fact that the 140 characters have become 280, a 100% increase , does not seem to have impressed him.) Thiel, along with economists such as Tyler Cowen ( The Gre
related reading
- Interview: Peter Thiel on Scientific Stagnationharvardsalient.com
- Home | Levers for Progressleversforprogress.com
- Notes on technology in the 2020selidourado.com
- Thiel on Progress and Stagnation — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Nanotechnology’s spring - Works in Progress Magazineworksinprogress.co
- Is Science Stagnant? - The Atlantictheatlantic.com
- Why transformative artificial intelligence is really, really hard to achievethegradient.pub
- On Progress and Intelligencesohamgovande.com
- Getting lost in stagnation - J. Storrs Hallworksinprogress.co
- How Technology Grows (a Restatement of Definite Optimism)danwang.co
- This Can't Go Oncold-takes.com
- Why I think AI take-off is relatively slow - Marginal REVOLUTIONmarginalrevolution.com