How Technology Grows (a Restatement of Definite Optimism)
The deepest bias in American intellectual society; a new Moby-Dick; the US isn't making the best robots; plastics; process knowledge as industrial deepening
I consider Definite Optimism as Human Capital to be my most creative piece. Unfortunately, it’s oblique and meandering. So I thought to write a followup to lay out its premises more directly and to offer a restatement of its ideas. The goal of both pieces is to broaden the terms in which we discuss “technology.” Technology should be understood in three distinct forms: as processes embedded into tools (like pots, pans, and stoves); explicit instructions (like recipes); and as process knowledge, or what we can also refer to as tacit knowledge, know-how, and technical experience. Process knowledg
saved by
related reading
- Definite optimism as human capital | Dan Wangdanwang.co
- The Techno-Optimist Manifesto | Andreessen Horowitza16z.com
- My techno-optimismvitalik.eth.limo
- Why transformative artificial intelligence is really, really hard to achievethegradient.pub
- ⚡️ Take Back the Future!reboothq.substack.com
- What is Technology? — Letters to a Young Technologistletterstoayoungtechnologist.com
- Frank Chimero · The Good Roomfrankchimero.com
- GDP and prosperity across technology pathsphiliptrammell.substack.com
- Society's Technical Debt and Software's Gutenberg Momentskventures.substack.com
- The Techno-Optimist Manifesto - Marc Andreessen Substackpmarca.substack.com
- How to Reindustrialize America: The Case for a Strategic Investment Fundforeignaffairs.com
- Faster Growth, Fairer Growth: Reviving Innovation and Dynamismniskanencenter.org