Why Is It So Hard to Predict the Future? - The Atlantic
theatlantic.com · 2,302 words · saved by 2 readers
Credentialed authorities are comically bad at predicting the future. But reliable forecasting is possible.
The bet was on, and it was over the fate of humanity. On one side was the Stanford biologist Paul R. Ehrlich. In his 1968 best seller, The Population Bomb , Ehrlich insisted that it was too late to prevent a doomsday apocalypse resulting from overpopulation. Resource shortages would cause hundreds of millions of starvation deaths within a decade. It was cold, hard math: The human population was growing exponentially; the food supply was not. Ehrlich was an accomplished butterfly specialist. He knew that nature did not regulate animal populations delicately. Populations exploded, blowing past t
saved by
related reading
- Futurist prediction methods and accuracydanluu.com
- Predicting the future: A lecture by Philip Tetlockyoutube.com
- The Illusion of Knowledgeoaktreecapital.com
- How to Predict the Future - by Santi Ruiz - Statecraftstatecraft.pub
- How a ragtag band of internet friends became the best at forecasting world eventsvox.com
- The End of Children | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
- The AI Superforecasters Are Here - by Scott Alexanderastralcodexten.com
- What 2026 looks like — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Do We Think Too Much About the Future? | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
- Why Humans Are So Bad at Seeing the Future | WIREDwired.com
- Confront reality (Aaron Swartz's Raw Thought)aaronsw.com
- Philip E. Tetlock on Forecasting and Foraging as a Fox (Ep. 93) | Conversations with Tylerconversationswithtyler.com