Do We Think Too Much About the Future? | The New Yorker
newyorker.com · 1,649 words · saved by 1 readers
For most of history, people didn’t try predicting the future. Maybe that was wise.
Save this story Save this story You’re reading Open Questions , Joshua Rothman’s weekly column exploring what it means to be human. If you had lived in the early decades of the sixteenth century, how would you have thought about the future? Presumably, you would have considered it in everyday terms: you would have wondered whether it would rain tomorrow, speculated about what might happen in your town over the summer, and hoped to get married someday. But, in other respects, your approach to the future might have been unusual, at least by our modern lights. If you were religious—and who wasn’t
saved by
related reading
- Futurist prediction methods and accuracydanluu.com
- Existential risk, AI, and the inevitable turn in human history - Marginal REVOLUTIONmarginalrevolution.com
- Turning 20 in the probable pre-apocalypse — LessWronglesswrong.com
- You will be OK — LessWronglesswrong.com
- What 2026 looks like — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Why Is It So Hard to Predict the Future? - The Atlantictheatlantic.com
- The future is vast – what does this mean for our own life? | Our World in Dataourworldindata.org
- On Progress and Historical Change – Ex Urbeexurbe.com
- The future of climate: do you have any idea what's really coming?seanmungerhistory.substack.com
- Why Humans Are So Bad at Seeing the Future | WIREDwired.com
- Everything is Predictionblog.cassi-ai.com
- Facing the Precipice of Historysubstack.com