Your "shoulds" are not a duty
I have a friend who, after reading my last two posts, still struggled to give up her shoulds. She protested that, if she stopped doing things because she should, then she might do the wrong thing. I see this frequently, even among people who claim to be moral relativists: they
I have a friend who, after reading my last two posts, still struggled to give up her shoulds. She protested that, if she stopped doing things because she should, then she might do the wrong thing. I see this frequently, even among people who claim to be moral relativists: they protest that if they weigh their wants and their shoulds on the same scales, then they might make the wrong choice. But this notion of "right" vs "wrong" cannot come from outside. There is no stone tablet among the stars that mandates what is right. Moral relativists usually have no trouble remembering that their narrow,
related reading
- Not because you "should"mindingourway.com
- "Should" considered harmfulmindingourway.com
- Half-assing it with everything you've gotmindingourway.com
- interesting and funbooritney.com
- How ‘Should’ Makes Us Stupid — And How to Get Smart Againmedium.com
- not disappointing myselfava.substack.com
- Loosening the grip of utilitarianismacotra.substack.com
- i can do more more more - by Claire Wang - cold brew blogclairebookworm.substack.com
- On sincerity - Joe Carlsmithjoecarlsmith.com
- Heading Toward Morality — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Matt Yglesias Considered As The Nietzschean Supermanastralcodexten.com
- You don't get to know what you're fighting formindingourway.com