Your "shoulds" are not a duty
I have a friend who, after reading my last two posts, still struggled to give up her shoulds. She protested that, if she stopped doing things because she should, then she might do the wrong thing. I see this frequently, even among people who claim to be moral relativists: they
I have a friend who, after reading my last two posts, still struggled to give up her shoulds. She protested that, if she stopped doing things because she should, then she might do the wrong thing. I see this frequently, even among people who claim to be moral relativists: they protest that if they weigh their wants and their shoulds on the same scales, then they might make the wrong choice. But this notion of "right" vs "wrong" cannot come from outside. There is no stone tablet among the stars that mandates what is right. Moral relativists usually have no trouble remembering that their narrow,
related reading
- Not because you "should"mindingourway.com
- "Should" considered harmfulmindingourway.com
- Half-assing it with everything you've gotmindingourway.com
- Working yourself ragged is not a virtuemindingourway.com
- Is it morally wrong to not take care of yourself?psyche.co
- You're allowed to fight for somethingmindingourway.com
- Some Painful Questions We Ask Ourselvessashachapin.substack.com
- Alignment & Succession: Morality Lives in the Human Individualnosetgauge.com
- Mini Blog Post 8: What altruism means to me - Neel Nandaneelnanda.io
- Religion for the Nonreligious — Wait But Whywaitbutwhy.com
- Loosening the grip of utilitarianismacotra.substack.com
- You don't get to know what you're fighting formindingourway.com