"Should" considered harmful
My last few posts have been aimed at addressing what I call the "listless guilt," the vague sense of guilt that stems from not doing anything in particular. I said: The listless guilt is a guilt about not doing anything. To remove it, we must first turn it
My last few posts have been aimed at addressing what I call the "listless guilt," the vague sense of guilt that stems from not doing anything in particular. I said: The listless guilt is a guilt about not doing anything. To remove it, we must first turn it into a guilt about not doing something in particular. If you didn't have a listless guilt, or if you did and the last few posts worked for you, then you may now find yourself wrestling with a very pointed sort of guilt that stems from not doing particular things. These next few posts will address the pointed guilts. One of the most common so
saved by
related reading
- Not because you "should"mindingourway.com
- You're allowed to fight for somethingmindingourway.com
- Working yourself ragged is not a virtuemindingourway.com
- Half-assing it with everything you've gotmindingourway.com
- Replacing guiltmindingourway.com
- The Replacing Guilt seriesmindingourway.com
- Post 35: Your Standards are Too High - Neel Nandaneelnanda.io
- Your "shoulds" are not a dutymindingourway.com
- Table of Contents | Replacing Guiltreplacingguilt.com
- Don't steer with guiltmindingourway.com
- How ‘Should’ Makes Us Stupid — And How to Get Smart Againmedium.com
- Don't steer with guilt — LessWronglesswrong.com