Headcount goals, feature factories, and when to hire those mythical 10x people · Erik Bernhardsson
Building up my team at Better, I made a very conscious decision to pay at the high end to get people. I thought this made more sense: they cost a bit more money to hire, but output usually more than compensates for it. Many fellow CTOs, some went for the other side of the spectrum. This was a mystery to me, until it all made sense to me.
Headcount goals, feature factories, and when to hire those mythical 10x people 2019-02-21 When I started building up a tech team for Better , I made a very conscious decision to pay at the high end to get people. I thought this made more sense: they cost a bit more money to hire, but output usually more than compensates for it. Many fellow CTOs, some went for the other side of the spectrum. This was a mystery to me, until it all made sense to me. What is output? Before we get started, let me clarify what I mean by "output" or "productivity". I don't mean an engineer just hammering on the keybo
Explore this link on the map →related reading
- Salary Negotiation: Make More Money, Be More Valued | Kalzumeus Softwarekalzumeus.com
- No One is Really Workinghumaninvariant.com
- Hey, N00b, We Didn't Hire You to Complete Tasksnewsletter.kentbeck.com
- I believe in the 10x engineer, but... · Erik Bernhardssonerikbern.com
- Don't Call Yourself A Programmer, And Other Career Advice | Kalzumeus Softwarekalzumeus.com
- Impact, agency, and taste | benkuhn.netbenkuhn.net
- 10x (engineer, context) pairs | benkuhn.netbenkuhn.net
- Hiring: Why More is Often Less | RKGrkg.blog
- Nadia Asparouhova | Explaining tech's notion of talent scarcitynadia.xyz
- I could do that in a weekend!danluu.com
- Stuff you should have been taught in college but weren’t – Casey Handmer's blogcaseyhandmer.wordpress.com
- What "The Best" Looks Like | Alex Kurilinkuril.in