✳flâneur — a map of the web's best reading
Making decisions using multiple worldviews
thinkingcomplete.com · 3,424 words · saved by 1 readers
Tl;dr: the problem of how to make decisions using multiple (potentially incompatible) worldviews (which I'll call the problem of meta-ration...
Making decisions using multiple worldviews Get link Facebook X Pinterest Email Other Apps July 21, 2022 Tl;dr: the problem of how to make decisions using multiple (potentially incompatible) worldviews (which I'll call the problem of meta-rationality) comes up in a range of contexts, such as epistemic deference. Applying a policy-oriented approach to meta-rationality, and evaluating worldviews by the quality of their advice, dissolves several undesirable consequences of the standard "epistemic" approach to deference. Meta-rationality as the limiting case of separate worldviews When thinking abo
Explore this link on the map →related reading
- Bayesian Mindsetcold-takes.com
- How To Think Real Good | Meta-rationalitymetarationality.com
- In defence of epistemic modesty — EA Forumforum.effectivealtruism.org
- Review: Planecrash — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Evidential Cooperation in Large Worlds: Potential Objections & FAQ — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Multiverse-wide Cooperation via Correlated Decision Making – Center on Long-Term Risklongtermrisk.org
- We should be more uncertain about cause prioritization based on philosophical arguments — EA Forumforum.effectivealtruism.org
- Probabilities Without Measurements | Vaden Masranivmasrani.github.io
- Improving decision making in key institutions | 80,000 Hours80000hours.org
- A Path out of Insufficient Views — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Richard Pettigrew | Philosophyrichardpettigrew.com
- Logical decision theories — LessWrongarbital.com