No Physical Substrate, No Problem | Slate Star Codex
Yesterday I posted a link to an article in which Steve Wozniak joins other luminaries like Elon Musk and Bill Gates in warning about the dangers of artificial superintelligence. A commenter replied: Elon Musk, Stephen Hawking, Bill Gates, and Steve Wozniak still aren’t enough for me, not until one of them can describe the process by which we go from ‘AI exists on computer’ to ‘AI killing human beings in physical reality’ by using something other than ridiculous, unforgivable cheating. There are lots of good arguments against considering superintelligence a threat. Maybe strong AI is centuries or millennia away. Maybe there will be a very gradual transition from human-level AI to superintelligent AI that no single agent will be able to exploit. And maybe superintelligence can be safely contained in a very carefully shielded chamber with no means of connection to the outside world. But the argument above has always seemed to me like one of the weakest. Maybe we’ll create a superintellige
Explore this link on the map →saved by
related reading
- The Artificial Intelligence Revolution: Part 2 - Wait But Whywaitbutwhy.com
- Superintelligence: The Idea That Eats Smart Peopleidlewords.com
- The Artificial Intelligence Revolution: Part 1 - Wait But Whywaitbutwhy.com
- Dario Amodei — The Adolescence of Technologydarioamodei.com
- Notes on Existential Risk from Artificial Superintelligencemichaelnotebook.com
- Superintelligence FAQ — LessWronglesswrong.com
- The 'Don't Look Up' Thinking That Could Doom Us With AItime.com
- Why AGI Will Not Happen - Tim Dettmerstimdettmers.com
- Notes on Existential Risk from Artificial Superintelligencemichaelnotebook.com
- Center for a Stateless Society >> Review: Superintelligence — Paths, Dangers, Strategiesc4ss.org
- Which Future?michaelnotebook.com
- The case for AI doom isn't very convincingunderstandingai.org