Toward more rigorous and informative nutritional epidemiology: the rational space between dismissal and defense of the status quo - PMC
Official websites use .gov A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Jan 1. Published in final edited form as: Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. 2021 Oct 22;63(18):3150–3167. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2021.1985427 Abstract To date, nutritional epidemiology has relied heavily on relatively weak methods including simple observational designs and substandard measurements. Despite low internal validity and other sources of bias, claims of causality are made commonly in this literature. Nutritional epidemiology investigations can be improved through greater scientific rigor and adherence to scientific reporting commensurate with…
saved by
related reading
- Nutritional Epidemiology and Dietary Assessment for Patients With Kidney Disease: A Primer - PMCpmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Nutritional anthropology in the worldjphysiolanthropol.biomedcentral.com
- Read This, Not That: The Hidden Cost of Nutrition Misinformation—Asteriskasteriskmag.com
- Minimal-trust investigationscold-takes.com
- Never trust The Science™substack.com
- How much do you believe your results? — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Beware The Man Of One Studyslatestarcodex.com
- How to Cook for Odysseussimonsarris.substack.com
- 1 Introduction – <span style='font-weight: 700'>Causal Inference</span><br/> <i style='color: #00b7ff'>The Mixtape</i>mixtape.scunning.com
- Getting Eulered | Slate Star Codexslatestarcodex.com
- In Defense of Food: My Review | Say what, Michael Pollan?saywhatmichaelpollan.wordpress.com
- CAUSE, EFFECT, AND THE STRUCTURE OF THE SOCIAL WORLD. MEGAN T. STEVENSONbu.edu