Why Olga Tokarczuk Is Wrong About AI - ArtReview
artreview.com · 1,006 words · saved by 1 readers
The Nobel Laureate’s recent comments on her use of AI in ‘preliminary research’ have hit a nerve – and rightly so
The Nobel Laureate’s recent comments on her use of AI in ‘preliminary research’ have hit a nerve – and rightly so, says Helen Charman Yesterday was a particularly bad day for writers and readers with concerns about artificial intelligence. First, claims circulated that ‘The Serpent in the Grove’ by Jamir Nazir, the Caribbean regional winner of the 2026 Granta Commonwealth Short Story Prize, was predominantly AI-generated: prize organisers said they ‘take these claims seriously and are committed to responding to them’, and while Nazir is said to deny using AI in this instance, Granta temporaril
saved by
related reading
- If you let AI do your writing, I will come to your house and kill yousamkriss.substack.com
- Why A.I. Isn’t Going to Make Art | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
- Large Language Muddle | The Editorsnplusonemag.com
- The Computational Poetdistressedscientists.substack.com
- From Pen to Prompt: How Creative Writers Integrate AI into their Writing Practicearxiv.org
- should we use AI to write?velvetnoise.substack.com
- The future of literary fiction/‘high art’ in the age of AI : r/TrueLitreddit.com
- I knew my writing students were using AI. Their confessions led to a powerful teaching moment | AI (artificial intelligence) | The Guardiantheguardian.com
- 32 notes on AI & writingjasmi.news
- Why You Should Almost Never Use AI to Write Anything Substantiveerichgrunewald.com
- AI and I: The Age of Artificial Creativity - Ness Labsnesslabs.com
- God help me am I about to change my view on AI-assisted writing?rivalvoices.substack.com