Why Olga Tokarczuk Is Wrong About AI - ArtReview
artreview.com · 1,006 words · saved by 1 readers
The Nobel Laureate’s recent comments on her use of AI in ‘preliminary research’ have hit a nerve – and rightly so
The Nobel Laureate’s recent comments on her use of AI in ‘preliminary research’ have hit a nerve – and rightly so, says Helen Charman Yesterday was a particularly bad day for writers and readers with concerns about artificial intelligence. First, claims circulated that ‘The Serpent in the Grove’ by Jamir Nazir, the Caribbean regional winner of the 2026 Granta Commonwealth Short Story Prize, was predominantly AI-generated: prize organisers said they ‘take these claims seriously and are committed to responding to them’, and while Nazir is said to deny using AI in this instance, Granta temporaril
saved by
related reading
- Why A.I. Isn’t Going to Make Art | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
- If you let AI do your writing, I will come to your house and kill yousamkriss.substack.com
- Olga Tokarczuk – Biographical - NobelPrize.orgnobelprize.org
- should we use AI to write?velvetnoise.substack.com
- There Is No A.I. | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
- I don't care (anymore) if your writing got a Pangram false positiveandrewwu.substack.com
- The Human Skill That Eludes AI - The Atlantictheatlantic.com
- The future of literary fiction/‘high art’ in the age of AI : r/TrueLitreddit.com
- how I feel about AI-generated artrona.substack.com
- Can A.I. Produce Writing That We Actually Want to Read? | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
- The Yale Review | Melanie Mitchell: The Dangerous Unknowns at the…yalereview.org
- Large Language Muddle | The Editorsnplusonemag.com