I don't care (anymore) if your writing got a Pangram false positive
andrewwu.substack.com · 1,720 words · saved by 9 readers
I'll still think less of it (and you) (for the most part) (though hedging is not my style right now)
Pangram is the world’s best AI-text detection software. It has been so since 2024, where it compared favorably to GPTZero, Originality, and DetectGPT in all metrics (accuracy,1 false positive rate,2 and more.) Independent audits say the same. It achieved some notoriety in literary circles, after Nabeel Qureshi claimed a regional winner of the prestigious Commonwealth Prize had generated their entire short story using AI and backed up his claim with another Twitter user’s Pangram screenshot. Most recently, it was been integrated into Substack itself. There’s a lot of Substack discourse about…
saved by
- Elizabeth Qiu
- Andrew Wu
- Gloria Ma
- Brady Gho
- Alex Wang
- Jaeho Lee
- Aiden Jeong
- Mingyue Yang
- Miguel Villa Floran
related reading
- I Wouldn't Say Pangram is Broken, But I Would Say That It's Brittlesubstack.com
- Seeing in Pangram Space | Pangrampangram.com
- How does Pangram work?pangram.substack.com
- Pangram 4 Technical Reportpangram-public.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com
- How does Pangram work?substack.com
- Pangram 4 Technical Overviewpangram.com
- If you let AI do your writing, I will come to your house and kill yousamkriss.substack.com
- We Can't Let AI Writing Take Over the Internetderekthompson.org
- God help me am I about to change my view on AI-assisted writing?rivalvoices.substack.com
- Hank Green, Pangram, and Our Cultural Commonsadamkhoja.substack.com
- I Will Fucking Piledrive You If You Mention AI Again — Ludicityludic.mataroa.blog
- I can never talk to an AI anonymously againtheargumentmag.com