Engaging China on Strategic Stability and Mutual Vulnerability - Carnegie Endowment for International Peace
carnegieendowment.org · 9,118 words · saved by 1 readers
The U.S. and Chinese governments, for the foreseeable future, will have the resources to keep each other’s society vulnerable to nuclear mass destruction.
Summary The United States and Chinese governments, for the foreseeable future, will have the resources to keep each other’s societies vulnerable to nuclear mass destruction. If these governments are not self-destructive, they will want to keep their competition from escalating into armed conflict that could lead to nuclear war. The constructs of strategic stability and mutual vulnerability can help significantly if both governments embrace them and interpret them similarly or even if the leaders of the two countries accurately understand how they differ in their perspectives on them.…
related reading
- Seeking Stability in the Competition for AI Advantage | RANDrand.org
- A Path Forward on AI Safety for the United States and Chinacarnegieendowment.org
- Why Beijing isn't taking the bait with Trump | Brookingsbrookings.edu
- What Does America Want From China? | Foreign Affairsforeignaffairs.com
- 2028: Two scenarios for global AI leadership \ Anthropicanthropic.com
- Confronting Another Axis? History, Humility, and Wishful Thinking - Texas National Security Reviewtnsr.org
- The China Trap: U.S. Foreign Policy and the Perilous Logic of Zero-Sum Competitionforeignaffairs.com
- How can the US and China prevent a war? | Nouriel Roubini | The Guardiantheguardian.com
- At the Trump-Xi Summit, China Will Have the Upper Handcfr.org
- The Changing Geopolitics of Nuclear Energy: A Look at the United States, Russia, and Chinacsis.org
- The AI Arms Race Isn’t Inevitablepalladiummag.com
- AI Coordination Without Illusionaei.org