The Planet on the Plate: Why Epicurious Left Beef Behind | Epicurious
epicurious.com · 651 words · saved by 1 readers
In an effort to encourage more sustainable cooking, we won't be publishing new beef recipes on Epicurious.
Save this story Save this story For any person—or publication—wanting to envision a more sustainable way to cook, cutting out beef is a worthwhile first step. Almost 15 percent of greenhouse gas emissions globally come from livestock (and everything involved in raising it); 61 percent of those emissions can be traced back to beef. Cows are 20 times less efficient to raise than beans and roughly three times less efficient than poultry and pork . It might not feel like much, but cutting out just a single ingredient—beef—can have an outsize impact on making a person’s cooking more environmentally
related reading
- Microbe-based faux beef could cut CO2 pollution by more than 80 percentinterestingengineering.com
- we are what we eatowenwang.com
- Where’s the Beef?harpers.org
- Inside the fantastical, pragmatic quest to make “hybrid” meatvox.com
- Big Beefing | John Kaziorthebaffler.com
- Grilling the Globe - JSTOR Dailydaily.jstor.org
- Inside big beef’s climate messaging machine: confuse, defend and downplay | Beef | The Guardiantheguardian.com
- If You're Going To Eat Animals, Eat Beef and Dairy — EA Forumforum.effectivealtruism.org
- Why Building a Sustainable Food Supply Chain Means Ending Factory Farming | Eatereater.com
- Essays on Reducing Sufferingreducing-suffering.org
- We raise 18 billion animals a year to die — and then we don’t even eat themvox.com
- Generative artificial intelligence creates delicious, sustainable, and nutritious burgers | npj Science of Foodnature.com