p < 0.05 considered harmful - by Richard Demsyn-Jones
simplicityissota.substack.com · 1,596 words · saved by 1 readers
The unreasonable persistence of an old standard
p < 0.05 considered harmful The unreasonable persistence of an old standard Richard Demsyn-Jones Apr 10, 2023 2 Share I spend a lot of time thinking about decision criteria for shipping experimental features. The topic could use a little more attention. Maybe it’s higher up the Maslow’s hierarchy of experimentation, somewhere above the prerequisites of actually running randomized experiments, constructing them optimally, and analyzing them correctly. Yet it is still important to actually ask: under what conditions do we ship? When it comes to this question, there’s a magic number that breaks t
related reading
- P-Hacking in Startups | Hacker Newsnews.ycombinator.com
- What a nerdy debate about p-values shows about science — and how to fix it | Voxvox.com
- The P Value and Statistical Significance: Misunderstandings, Explanations, Challenges, and Alternativesncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- How much do you believe your results? — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Against NHST — LessWronglesswrong.com
- P-Value Method for Hypothesis Testing | Towards Data Sciencetowardsdatascience.com
- An Actually Correct Explanation of P-Valuesoutsidetheasylum.blog
- Be good-argument-driven, not data-driven - Richard Marmorsteintwitchard.github.io
- How Should We Critique Research? · Gwern.netgwern.net
- Bad Problems Don't Stop Being Bad Because Somebody's Wrong About Fault Analysis — LessWronglesswrong.com
- How To Write Quickly While Maintaining Epistemic Rigor — LessWronglesswrong.com
- The rise and fall of peer review - by Adam Mastroianniexperimentalhistory.substack.com