We’re (in) the money - by David Phelps - Three quarks
davidphelps.substack.com · 3,507 words · saved by 1 readers
Collectives have always failed historically. Will social tokens let them thrive?
We’re (in) the money Collectives have always failed historically. Will social tokens let them thrive? David Phelps Aug 26, 2021 20 3 Share Social Tokens of 1933 A wink, the anthropologist Clifford Geertz noted, is not necessarily a wink . A machine-learning algorithm might have some difficulty differentiating between one person’s involuntary spasm of the eyelid and another’s come-hither coquetry, just as it might struggle to identify someone’s mocking of the former or rehearsal of the latter. Each of these is, technically speaking, a wink , but to understand what they mean requires that one be
related reading
- Creators, Communities, and the Gray Space in the Middle — Nichanan Kesonpatnichanank.com
- Come for the Network, Pay for the Toolsubpixel.space
- Web4: Social Moniesmeow.bio
- Membership NFTs — natimurilmirror.xyz
- Designing Token Economies - Not Boring by Packy McCormicknotboring.co
- The Currency of Communitydavidphelps.substack.com
- Three quarks | David Phelps | Substackdavidphelps.substack.com
- SocialFi: A Blank Canvas for Web3 Social Apps – Variantvariant.fund
- Exit To Community - NOEMAnoemamag.com
- The Ownership Economy 2022 – Variantvariant.fund
- Web3 Social Landscape — Forefrontforefront.mirror.xyz
- A Prehistory of DAOs — Mirrorgnosisguild.mirror.xyz