Membership NFTs — natimuril
In the context of crypto, social networks are better described as socioeconomic networks. The major difference being that economic utility is built natively into your group chat. Communities are structured around a shared treasury, with each holder staked in its success through token ownership. Large treasuries are made up of primarily ERC-20 tokens, which offer more liquidity, diversification, and accessibility.
In the context of crypto, social networks are better described as socioeconomic networks. The major difference being that economic utility is built natively into your group chat. Communities are structured around a shared treasury, with each holder staked in its success through token ownership. Large treasuries are made up of primarily ERC-20 tokens, which offer more liquidity, diversification, and accessibility. Despite this, not all communities need a token. In fact, most don’t. NFTs are an improved model for fungible social tokens. Psychology of a non fungible holder ERC-20s are unfriendly
related reading
- A Practical Guide to NFT Memberships for Creators | Futurefuture.com
- The Currency of Communitydavidphelps.substack.com
- Moxie Marlinspike >> Blog >> My first impressions of web3moxie.org
- On Web3 Membership and Composable Monetization — Andrew Hongath.mirror.xyz
- A beginner's guide to NFTs — Mirrorlinda.mirror.xyz
- Come for the Network, Pay for the Toolsubpixel.space
- Magic Beansstudio.ribbonfarm.com
- NFTs, DAOs and the importance of roadmapscointelegraph.com
- Tokenomics 101: The Basics of Evaluating Cryptocurrenciesevery.to
- Designing Token Economies - Not Boring by Packy McCormicknotboring.co
- We’re (in) the money - by David Phelps - Three quarksdavidphelps.substack.com
- SocialFi: A Blank Canvas for Web3 Social Apps – Variantvariant.fund