This is biology's century. We're not ready for it
This is "biology's century," @matthewherper writes. But we’re approaching a moment when changes in what we understand are every bit as terrifying as exhilarating.
The first time I remember hearing the words “biology’s century,” it was a sales pitch. I was standing by the Long Island Sound in Sachem’s Head, Conn., in the shadow of an 11-foot-tall granite Stonehenge replica built by Jonathan Rothberg, a biotech entrepreneur, as he talked up his newest gadget, a tabletop DNA sequencer. It was 2010. Near his monument to the ancient past, Rothberg was conjuring a vision of the future, one based on harnessing the power of biology and technology to transform the world. The phrase he uttered wasn’t new, having been in circulation since the Human Genome…
saved by
related reading
- Rebuild Biotech for the AI Era | Benchlingbenchling.com
- Why is progress in biology so slow?sam-rodriques.com
- We’re entering a golden age of engineering biologynoahpinion.blog
- On AI Infrastructure in Biology - by Elliot Hershbergcenturyofbio.com
- Welcome to the 21st Century: How To Plan For The Post-Covid Future - O'Reilly Mediaoreilly.com
- Levers for Biological Progress - by Niko McCartyasimov.press
- Biotech Startups: Move Slow and Fix Things - Stanford Biotechnology Groupstanfordbiotechgroup.com
- Synbio25 - A man thinks about building biologysynbio25.com
- The "most important century" blog post seriescold-takes.com
- Notes on technology in the 2020selidourado.com
- The Age of Tech x Bio: The 'Industrial Bio Complex' | Andreessen Horowitza16z.com
- Ask not why would you work in biology, but rather: why wouldn't you?owlposting.com