I can never talk to an AI anonymously again
theargumentmag.com · 2,411 words · saved by 8 readers
AI only needs 150 words to identify me. What does that mean for you?
Several advanced AI models, in particular Claude Opus 4.7, have demonstrated the ability to deduce the author of relatively small excerpts of text. Recently, Matt Yglesias and Jerusalem Demsas sparred on The Argument podcast over online anonymity. I am, myself, passionately and slightly fanatically on the pro-anonymity side. I think that it’s observably very easy for a society to make plenty of perfectly reasonable things unsayable and plenty of perfectly virtuous and meaningful lives unlivable, and anonymity is the only protection for the outcast. That includes gay people like me, who…
saved by
related reading
- User awareness in frontier modelstransluce.org
- If you let AI do your writing, I will come to your house and kill yousamkriss.substack.com
- trees are harlequins, words are harlequins - the voidnostalgebraist.tumblr.com
- Pangram 4 Technical Reportpangram-public.s3.us-east-1.amazonaws.com
- Claude Opus 4.5: Model Card, Alignment and Safetythezvi.substack.com
- Does distilling Claude carry the persona with it? — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Clio: Privacy-preserving insights into real-world AI use \ Anthropicanthropic.com
- How Claude's text watermarking worksanthropic.com
- The Mark of the Machinenewyorker.com
- Large-Scale Online Deanonymization with LLMssimonlermen.substack.com
- which_claude_is_k3/writeups/write_up.md at main · rgreenblatt/which_claude_is_k3 · GitHubgithub.com
- [2602.16800] Large-scale online deanonymization with LLMsarxiv.org