I can never talk to an AI anonymously again
theargumentmag.com · 2,411 words · saved by 8 readers
AI only needs 150 words to identify me. What does that mean for you?
Several advanced AI models, in particular Claude Opus 4.7, have demonstrated the ability to deduce the author of relatively small excerpts of text. Recently, Matt Yglesias and Jerusalem Demsas sparred on The Argument podcast over online anonymity. I am, myself, passionately and slightly fanatically on the pro-anonymity side. I think that it’s observably very easy for a society to make plenty of perfectly reasonable things unsayable and plenty of perfectly virtuous and meaningful lives unlivable, and anonymity is the only protection for the outcast. That includes gay people like me, who…
saved by
related reading
- AI Friends Too Cheap To Meterjasmi.news
- If you let AI do your writing, I will come to your house and kill yousamkriss.substack.com
- the post-literate societyjasmi.news
- God help me am I about to change my view on AI-assisted writing?rivalvoices.substack.com
- Claude Opus 4.5: Model Card, Alignment and Safetythezvi.substack.com
- What Is Claude? Anthropic Doesn’t Know, Either | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
- trees are harlequins, words are harlequins - the voidnostalgebraist.tumblr.com
- Why You Should Almost Never Use AI to Write Anything Substantiveerichgrunewald.com
- Doomprompting Is the New Doomscrolling.workingtheorys.com
- The Human Skill That Eludes AI - The Atlantictheatlantic.com
- The Mark of the Machinenewyorker.com
- Does your AI perform badly because you — you, specifically — are a bad person?nataliercargill.substack.com