Why the ATM didn’t kill bank teller jobs, but the iPhone did
substack.com · 4,248 words · saved by 1 readers
There's a lot more to replacing labor than just automating tasks
A few months ago, J. D. Vance, sitting vice president of the United States, gave an interview to Ross Douthat of the New York Times. During that interview, Vance and Douthat had an interesting exchange: Douthat: How much do you worry about the potential downsides of AI? Not even on the apocalyptic scale, but on the scale of the way human beings respond to a sense of their own obsolescence? These kinds of things. Vance: So, one, on the obsolescence point, I think the history of tech and innovation is that while it does cause job disruptions, it more often facilitates human productivity as…
related reading
- Why ATMs didn’t kill bank teller jobs, but the iPhone diddavidoks.blog
- Why ATMs didn’t kill bank teller jobs, but the iPhone diddavidoks.blog
- Why ATMs didn’t kill bank teller jobs, but the iPhone didsubstack.com
- When AI Becomes Laborgianfrancofilice.substack.com
- THE 2028 GLOBAL INTELLIGENCE CRISIScitriniresearch.com
- Why I’m not worried about AI job lossdavidoks.blog
- Why Are There Still So Many Jobs? The History and Future of Workplace Automationaeaweb.org
- My Last Five Years of Workpalladiummag.com
- Why Is Everyone In Tech So Sad?noemamag.com
- Introducing the Anthropic Economic Index \ Anthropicanthropic.com
- AI and the automation of work - Benedict Evansben-evans.com
- Tech doesn’t make our lives easier. It makes them fasterbrettscott.substack.com