The missing half of AI futurism debates
epochai.substack.com · 1,651 words · saved by 1 readers
Why we should think a little harder about what it takes to build a Dyson Sphere
This post is part of Epoch AI’s Gradient Updates newsletter, which shares more opinionated or informal takes on big questions in AI progress. These posts solely represent the views of the authors, and do not necessarily reflect the views of Epoch AI as a whole. If you follow AI discourse, you’ll inevitably run into some version of the following claim: a few years after we automate AI research, the world becomes unrecognizable, with nanotech, Dyson swarms, and near-light-speed spacecraft. For example, Ajeya Cotra argues that: “[A] vast population of superhuman AI agents will likely invent…
saved by
related reading
- The missing half of AI futurism debatesepoch.ai
- The Artificial Intelligence Revolution: Part 1 - Wait But Whywaitbutwhy.com
- Why transformative artificial intelligence is really, really hard to achievethegradient.pub
- Why AGI Will Not Happen - Tim Dettmerstimdettmers.com
- The Artificial Intelligence Revolution: Part 2 - Wait But Whywaitbutwhy.com
- II. From AGI to Superintelligence: the Intelligence Explosion - SITUATIONAL AWARENESSsituational-awareness.ai
- The case for multi-decade AI timelinesepochai.substack.com
- Why do people disagree about when powerful AI will arrive?blog.bluedot.org
- "Long" timelines to advanced AI have gotten crazy shorthelentoner.substack.com
- Will scaling work?dwarkeshpatel.com
- AI Timelines — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Does AI Progress Have a Speed Limit?—Asteriskasteriskmag.com