Antinomy
In philosophy, an antinomy (; Ancient Greek: antí 'against' + nómos 'law') is a real or apparent contradiction between two conclusions, both of which seem justified. It is a term used in logic and epistemology, particularly in the philosophy of Immanuel Kant.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia In philosophy, an antinomy (; Ancient Greek: antí 'against' + nómos 'law') is a real or apparent contradiction between two conclusions, both of which seem justified.[1] It is a term used in logic and epistemology, particularly in the philosophy of Immanuel Kant. Antinomy is a common form of argument in the dialogues of Plato. Kant credited Zeno of Elea (see Zeno's paradoxes) as the inventor of the antinomic mode of argumentation, which he described as a "skeptical method" of "watching, or rather provoking, a conflict of assertions, not for the purpose…
saved by
related reading
- Two Dogmas of Empiricism - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Hume's forken.wikipedia.org
- What the Tortoise Said to Achillesen.wikipedia.org
- Hegel’s Dialectics (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)plato.stanford.edu
- Ludwig Wittgenstein (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)plato.stanford.edu
- Stove, What Is Wrong With Our Thoughtsweb.maths.unsw.edu.au
- Immanuel Kant - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Analytic–synthetic distinction - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Liar paradox - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Intuitionistic logic - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Richard's paradoxen.wikipedia.org
- The logic of Buddhist philosophy goes beyond simple truthaeon.co