Paradox of analysis
The paradox of analysis (or Langford–Moore paradox) is a paradox that concerns how an analysis can be correct or informative but not both. The problem was formulated by philosopher G. E. Moore in his book Principia Ethica, and first named by C. H. Langford in his article "The Notion of Analysis in Moore's Philosophy" (in The Philosophy of G. E. Moore, edited by Paul Arthur Schilpp, Northwestern University, 1942, pp. 319–342).
Paradox of analysis - Wikipedia Jump to content From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Philosophical paradox by G. E. Moore Not to be confused with Moore's paradox . The paradox of analysis (or Langford–Moore paradox ) [ 1 ] is a paradox that concerns how an analysis can be correct or informative but not both. The problem was formulated by philosopher G. E. Moore in his book Principia Ethica , and first named by C. H. Langford in his article "The Notion of Analysis in Moore's Philosophy" (in The Philosophy of G. E. Moore , edited by Paul Arthur Schilpp , Northwestern University, 1942, pp. 319–3
saved by
related reading
- Potato paradox - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Moore's paradox - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Two Dogmas of Empiricism - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Ludwig Wittgenstein (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)plato.stanford.edu
- How To Be Good | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
- Liar paradox - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- New riddle of induction - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Bad Problems Don't Stop Being Bad Because Somebody's Wrong About Fault Analysis — LessWronglesswrong.com
- The Analytic/Synthetic Distinction (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)plato.stanford.edu
- Derek Parfit - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Antinomyen.wikipedia.org
- What the Tortoise Said to Achillesen.wikipedia.org