Hume's_fork
en.wikipedia.org · 1,901 words · saved by 1 readers
Couldn't find lead section for Hume's_fork
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Hume's fork contrasted with Kant's trident/pitchfork In epistemology, Hume's fork is a tenet elaborating upon British empiricist philosopher David Hume's emphatic division between "relations of ideas" and "matters of fact."[1][2] (Alternatively, Hume's fork may refer to what is otherwise termed Hume's law, a tenet of ethics.)[3] As phrased in Immanuel Kant's characterization of Hume's thesis, and furthered in the 1930s by the logical empiricists, Hume's fork asserts that all statements are exclusively either "analytic a priori" or "synthetic a…
saved by
related reading
- Is–ought problem - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Antinomyen.wikipedia.org
- Two Dogmas of Empiricism - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Sense data - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Naturalized epistemology - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- New riddle of induction - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- David Hume — Why we change our mind – Ralph Ammerralphammer.com
- David Hume - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Pragmatism - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Analytic–synthetic distinction - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
- Positivism - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org