Break the Department of Defense’s Acquisition Monopsony
firstbreakfast.com · 1,138 words · saved by 1 readers
For a long time, Walmart was a monopsony.
Break the Department of Defense’s Acquisition Monopsony Shyam Sankar , Madeline Hart , and Greg Little Sep 20, 2023 30 4 Share For a long time, Walmart was a monopsony. The inverse of a monopoly, a monopsony results when one entity is the sole buyer of a given product or service. Walmart developed a notorious reputation of using its monopsonistic power to force its vendors to meet its terms, which in turn allowed it to set extremely low consumer prices. But in a monopsony, the lowest price isn’t the best price for the market because it hides the true cost, drives down quality, and decreases co
saved by
related reading
- The Defense Reformation18theses.com
- Laws of Tech: Commoditize Your Complement · Gwern.netgwern.net
- How to Fix Defense Procurement - by Santi Ruiz - Statecraftstatecraft.pub
- Amazon’s Antitrust Paradox | Yale Law Journalyalelawjournal.org
- DoD Contracting for Startups 101a16z.com
- Who's Demand Signal is it Anyway?abovethenoisefloor.substack.com
- Why is it so hard to buy things that work well?danluu.com
- Defensibility & Competition - by Elad Gil - Elad Blogblog.eladgil.com
- Laws of Tech: Commoditize Your Complement · Gwern.netgwern.net
- Defense Technologyainventures.com
- America’s monopoly and antitrust problem, explained by your internet bill | Voxvox.com
- The Case for Commodity Marketsbalachandrasekaran.substack.com