You do not need 'ethics' to be good - by Max Langenkamp
maxlangenkamp.substack.com · 1,879 words · saved by 1 readers
Good interactions involve knowledge, skill, care, and proximity
Taddeo di Bartolo, Gluttons in Hell (1393) As a dislocated fourteen year-old, I desperately wanted to know “how to be good”1. Luckily, I found refuge in moral philosophy. It taught me that I could learn to be good by thinking through the right rules. These could be found by logically examining thought experiments: Should you divert a runaway trolley to kill one person instead of five? Is it ethical to steal bread to feed yourself? If you and ten people are starving on a boat stranded at sea, is it wrong to use a lottery to figure out who you should eat? How wonderful, I thought, if I…
related reading
- How To Be Good | The New Yorkernewyorker.com
- How to be right about ethics when it mattersmorallawwithin.substack.com
- Notes on Effective Altruismmichaelnotebook.com
- The Trouble With "Good" — LessWronglesswrong.com
- How to Do Philosophypaulgraham.com
- Consequentialism FAQweb.archive.org
- How to Do Philosophypaulgraham.com
- The Sovereignty of Goodeganphilosophy.com
- A Simple Case for Studying Morals - by Gabecognition.cafe
- Failing To Do Goodsubstack.com
- Moral Disagreementplato.stanford.edu
- Aristotle’s Ethics (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)plato.stanford.edu