Jenba's Quick takes — EA Forum
forum.effectivealtruism.org · 1,928 words · saved by 1 readers
A collection of shorter posts by EA Forum user Jen baik
Comments 21 Sorted by New & upvoted 86 4 more 15 Do you think the marketing is false because: The roles are getting more than enough qualified, competent applicants? The cause area of AI safety is saturated with talent? AI safety is not impactful enough to justify claims like "this cause area is particularly important to scale"? I'm not sure the analogies to Google or Harvard are useful here. These organizations are driven by profits/enrollments, not by impact. They likely are far less picky than AI safety orgs because they are very big and don't require the incredibly niche…
saved by
related reading
- Sixteen schemes for AI safetymanifund.substack.com
- AI safety undervalues founders — LessWronglesswrong.com
- The AI research job market shit show (and my experience)interconnects.ai
- I'm Switching Into AI Safetyalexirpan.com
- AI safety is maturing. Is its generalist talent pipeline keeping up? — EA Forumforum.effectivealtruism.org
- AGI safety career advice — EA Forumforum.effectivealtruism.org
- AI Safety is Bottlenecked - Opportunity for Impact is Highbriandavies.substack.com
- I Reviewed Hundreds of AI Safety Applications. Here's What Actually Matters | Georg Langegeorglange.com
- The case for AI safety capacity-building worksubstack.com
- My personal cruxes for working on AI safety — EA Forumforum.effectivealtruism.org
- Thoughts on the job market in the age of LLMsinterconnects.ai
- The case for AI safety capacity-building workmultipliercg.substack.com