The case for AI safety capacity-building work
multipliercg.substack.com · 6,800 words · saved by 1 readers
You can have large, predictable effects on getting people to work on important things.
The case for AI safety capacity-building work You can have large, predictable effects on getting people to work on important things. Asya Bergal Mar 10, 2026 16 1 Share TL;DR: I think many of the marginal hires at larger organizations doing AI safety technical or policy work right now (including e.g. Apollo, Redwood, METR, RAND, GovAI, Epoch, UKAISI, and Anthropic’s safety teams) would be capable of founding (or being early employees of) organizations focused on building capacity in AI safety, and would have more impact by doing so. I think the impact case for this kind of work is supported by
saved by
related reading
- The case for AI safety capacity-building worksubstack.com
- AI safety undervalues founders — LessWronglesswrong.com
- AI Safety is Bottlenecked - Opportunity for Impact is Highbriandavies.substack.com
- Ten AI safety projects I'd like people to work onthirdthing.ai
- Recommendations for Technical AI Safety Research Directionsalignment.anthropic.com
- How do we close the Junior <> Senior talent gap™? · Ady Mehtaadymehta.xyz
- Ten AI safety projects I'd like people to work on — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Want to upskill in technical AI safety? Here are 67 useful resources | 80,000 Hours80000hours.org
- AGI safety career advice — EA Forumforum.effectivealtruism.org
- How to get into AI safety in 3 months80000hours.substack.com
- What happens after we bring people into AI safety?clarityiscourage.substack.com
- Sixteen schemes for AI safetymanifund.substack.com