I Reviewed Hundreds of AI Safety Applications. Here's What Actually Matters | Georg Lange
georglange.com · 2,046 words · saved by 1 readers
Insights from reviewing applications for MATS and SPAR projects on what makes a competitive AI safety program application.
TLDR 2-6 month AI safety programs (MATS, Anthropic Fellows, Goodfire Fellows, Astra, etc.) are one of the best ways to break into AI safety Admissions are highly competitive: single-digit acceptance rates for MATS, 1.5% for Anthropic Fellows, ~15% for my SPAR projects Having reviewed applications for multiple MATS cohorts and SPAR projects, I’m sharing insights that can improve your chances of acceptance I originally wrote this for my SPAR scholars, but it applies to anyone applying to competitive AI safety programs. This guide has two goals: help you develop the skills that actually…
saved by
related reading
- 2025/2026 AI Safety Fellowship Application Experiences and Results | Yeedrag's website :Dyeedrag.github.io
- MATS 9 Retrospective & Advice — LessWronglesswrong.com
- AI safety undervalues founders — LessWronglesswrong.com
- Fellowships — The Safety Apprenticesafetyapprentice.com
- How do we close the Junior <> Senior talent gap™? · Ady Mehtaadymehta.xyz
- Surprising lessons from my research scientist job search | Yong Zheng-Xinyongzx.github.io
- AI Safety is Bottlenecked - Opportunity for Impact is Highbriandavies.substack.com
- Ten AI safety projects I'd like people to work onthirdthing.ai
- AI Safety's Biggest Talent Gap Isn't Researchers. It's Generalists. — EA Forumforum.effectivealtruism.org
- AI safety technical research | Career review | 80,000 Hours80000hours.org
- CAIS AI Dashboarddashboard.safe.ai
- Talent Needs of Technical AI Safety Teams — LessWronglesswrong.com