Panpsychism is crazy, but it’s also most probably true | Aeon Ideas

On the inner life of molecules and electrons: or why panpsychism is highly likely to be true, even if it sounds crazy

Photo by Stanislav Nevyhosteny/Wikipedia Common sense tells us that only living things have an inner life. Rabbits and tigers and mice have feelings, sensations and experiences; tables and rocks and molecules do not. Panpsychists deny this datum of common sense. According to panpsychism, the smallest bits of matter – things such as electrons and quarks – have very basic kinds of experience; an electron has an inner life. The main objection made to panpsychism is that it is ‘crazy’ and ‘just obviously wrong’. It is thought to be highly counterintuitive to suppose that an electron has some…

saved by

• Esther Thielking

related reading

• The hard problem of consciousness is a distraction from the real oneaeon.co
• Does Consciousness Pervade the Universe? | Scientific Americanscientificamerican.com
• Is Consciousness Part of the Fabric of the Universe? | Scientific Americanscientificamerican.com
• The Control Group Is Out Of Controlslatestarcodex.com
• Non-materialist physicalism: an experimentally testable conjecture.physicalism.com
• Is everything made of particles, fields or both combined?aeon.co
• An Argument for Micropsychism: If There is a Conscious Whole, There Must be Conscious Partsdegruyter.com
• Mysterious Answers to Mysterious Questions — LessWronglesswrong.com
• Russellian Monism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)plato.stanford.edu
• [2604.14234] Consciousness, Quantum Mechanics, and the Limits of Scientific Objectivismarxiv.org
• Taking Monism Seriouslyopentheory.net
• Why the world needs quantum mechanics – Michael Nielsenmichaelnielsen.org