Contributions to CHI | CHI 2021

The primary criterion for evaluation of all Papers remains the research’s contribution to HCI. However, the CHI program committee will still strongly encourage reviewers to recognize that there are many ways for which a paper can make a contribution to HCI, and to review the paper appropriately. In all cases, we will do our best to give every paper the most professional reviews and most meaningful discussion possible within the context of the actual submission. The Subcommittee Chairs are senior people who have a broad view of the field of Human-Computer interaction. They will adopt an inclusive perspective on what makes a valid research contribution to HCI. In all cases, a CHI Paper must break new ground and make an original research contribution. Below you will find some of the types of contributions a paper can make to HCI, and the associated criteria that a reviewer may use to assess this type of contribution. Development or Refinement of Interface Artifacts or Techniques concerns

{"code":"internal_server_error","message":" There has been a critical error on this website. Learn more about troubleshooting WordPress. ","data":{"status":500},"additional_errors":[]}

related reading

• Human–computer interaction - Wikipediaen.wikipedia.org
• How to win a best paper award (or, an opinionated take on how to do important research)nicholas.carlini.com
• I declined all my HCI PC invites. Here's why.minsukchang.com
• HCI.pdfpeople.cs.vt.edu
• What Makes a (Graphics) Systems Paper Beautifulgraphics.stanford.edu
• My Criteria for Reviewing Papersblog.evjang.com
• CS197 | Projectweb.stanford.edu
• Human Computer Interaction - brief intro | The Encyclopedia of Human-Computer Interaction, 2nd Ed.interaction-design.org
• Reviewer Instructions 2026icml.cc
• Is AI Breaking HCI?humanityworking.net
• Jef Raskin on "Intuitive Interfaces"asktog.com
• PowerPoint Presentationcs.ryerson.ca